3组女性骨质疏松治疗方案的成本-效果分析.pdfVIP

Pharmacy Today ? 201204 VoI. 22 No.4 ? 3 组女性骨质疏松治疗方案的成本-效果分析 陈忠英，浦锡娟 (广州开发区医院药剂科，广东广州 510730) 摘要:目的比较 3 组不同方法治疗女性骨质疏松症的成本-效果。方法将 56 例女性骨质疏松症患者分为 3 组， A 组:口服阿法骨化 醇+钙尔奇 D;B 组:口服阿法骨化醇+蜓贝钙组 ;C 组:口服阿法骨化醇+凯思主 D. 疗程为 9 个月，运用药物经济学原理进行成本- 效果分析。结果 3 种治疗方法的成本分别为 2239.83 、 2188.98 ， 2 拍2.46 元;有效率分别为 66.67% 、45)岛、77.78% ，成本，效果比分 别为 33.ω 、48.64 、 30.89 0 结论 C 组有效率高，成本-效果比低，为治疗女性骨质疏松症较经济的方案。 美髓词:骨质疏松:药物经济学;成本-效果分析 中图分类号:阳69 文献标志码 :A 文章编号 :1673 -4610(2012)04-ω08 -03 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis 013 Therapeutic Schedule in Treating Osteoporosis in Women CHEN Hui-yi 吨， PU Xi-juan (Guan萨hou Develepment Dístrict Hospital , Guangdong Province , Guangzhou 51073 ,Chína) Abstract: Objective To comp町e 由 e cost-effectiveness of 3 different therapeutic schedule in tr回ting osteoporosis in women. Methods A total of 56 women patients wi出 osteoporosis were randomly divided inω3gr四 ps ， in which A, B and C group were treated with Alpha D3 + Caltrate D, Alpha D3 + Haoheigai , and Alpha D3 + Calcichew D, respectívely. C耐 -effectiveness analysis were applied to 3 groUF圄. Results The costs of 耻 3 田atrnent groUF国 were 2239.83 , 2 188. 饵， and 2 402. 46 川剧， respectively; 也e effective rates were 66. 67% , 45% and 77. 78% , respectively. And the cω.t- efftiveness ratio were 33. 60 , 48.64, 30.89, respectively. Conclusionηle C therapeutic schedule wωthe hest in treating ost臼porosis in women with higher effective rate and lower cost-efftiveness ratio. Key words: osteoporosis; ph缸macωconomics; cost-effectiveness analysis 骨质疏松症( osteoporosis , üP) 是一种以骨量低下， 小的经济负担。因此，有必要应用药物经济学原理并 骨微结构破坏，导致骨脆性增加，易发生骨折为特征的