Normal visual evoked potential characteristics of.doc

 PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 4 Normal visual evoked potential characteristics of [Abstract] To investigate the normal visual evoked potential (visual evoked potential, VEP) features in order to obtain normal reference values. Methods: The French Metrovision produced by Vision Monitor Visual Evoked system to normal 60 cases (73) in white, red and blue light stimulation under the flash VEP examination, divided into four different groups according to age: A group (5 ~ 14 years old) 19, B group (15 to 29 years of age) 17, C group (30 ~ 49 years of age) 21, D group (50 ~ 65 years old) 16; pairs of normal 62 cases (77) at 15, 30 and 60min perspectives Reversi plate under the mesh flip graph graphics VEP stimulus checks. Divided into four different groups according to age: A group (5 to 14 years of age) 20, B group (15 to 29 years of age) 20, C group (30 ~ 49 years of age) 22, D group (50 ~ 65 years old) 15 . Results: In the white, red, blue flash stimulation P2 wave latencies were 122.2 ± 8.3,122.5 ± 11.7,124.1 ± 8.5ms; in the white group P2 stimulated by D-wave latency compared with other age groups, are there are differences (P amp;lt;0.05). The other age groups compared with each other and there was no significant. In the red and blue light stimulation of A group and D group, A group, D group compared with other age groups, have been extended, there are significant (P amp;lt;0.05), the other age groups compared with each other and there was no significant. In the 15 ‘, 30’ and 60 ‘flip angle Reversi plate grid graph P100 wave latency stimulation were 111.6 ± 6.0,105.9 ± 5.3,105.1 ± 3.8ms. Graphics VEP in all age groups compared with no significant (Pamp;gt; 0.05). Conclusion: white, red and blue light stimulation of 14-year-old age group and 50 years of age or older flash VEP P2 wave latency compared with other groups to extend, graphics VEP P100 wave latency in all age groups showed no significant difference. [Keywords:] normal 0 Introduction Visual evoked po