Comment on How effective and efficient are multiobjective evolutionary algorithms at hydrologic model calibration by Y. Tang et al., Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 289–307, 2006.docVIP

下载本文档

9
0
约6.68千字
约 4页
2017-05-08 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

Comment on How effective and efficient are multiobjective evolutionary algorithms at hydrologic model calibration by Y. Tang et al., Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 289–307, 2006.doc

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

Comment on How effective and efficient are multiobjective evolutionary algorithms at hydrologic model calibration by Y. Tang et al., Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 289–307, 2006

Hydrol.EarthSyst.Sci.Discuss.,4,179–182,2007 /4/179/2007/ ?Author(s)2007.Thisworkislicensed Hydrology and Earth System Sciences HESSD 4,179–182,2007 Discussions underaCreativeCommonsLicense. Commenton“How e?ectiveande?cient aremultiobjective evolutionary...” PaperspublishedinHydrologyandEarthSystemSciencesDiscussionsareunder open-accessreviewforthejournalHydrologyandEarthSystemSciences J.A.Vrugt Commenton“Howe?ectiveande?cient aremultiobjectiveevolutionaryalgorithms athydrologicmodelcalibration?” by Y.Tangetal.,Hydrol.EarthSyst.Sci.,10, 289–307,2006 TitlePage Abstract Conclusions Tables Introduction References Figures J J I I J.A.Vrugt EarthandEnvironmentalSciencesDivision,LosAlamosNationalLaboratory,LosAlamos, NM87544,USA Back Close FullScreen/Esc Received:10January2006–Accepted:15January2006–Published:31January2007 Correspondenceto:J.A.Vrugt(vrugt@) Printer-friendlyVersion InteractiveDiscussion 179 EGU InarecentpaperbyTang,ReedandWagener(2006,hereafterreferredtoasTRW) a comparison assessment was presented of three state-of-the-art evolutionary algo- rithms for multiobjective calibration of hydrologic models. Through three illustrative case studies, TRW demonstrate that the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm 2 (SPEA2)andEpsilonDominanceNondominatedSortedGeneticAlgorithm(ε-NSGAII) achieve a better performance than the Multi-objective Shu?ed Complex Evolution Metropolis algorithm (MOSCEM-UA), previously developed by us and presented in Vrugt et al. (2003). I would like to congratulate TRW with their paper, which I be- lieveprovidesastrongandvaluablecontributiontothe?eldofhydrologicmodelcali- HESSD 4,179–182,2007 5 Commenton“How e?ectiveande?cient aremultiobjective evolutionary...” 10 bration. However,Iwishtodi?erinopinionaboutsomeofthemainconclusionspre- sentedintheirpaper,especiallywithrespecttotheseeminglyinferiorperformanceof theMOSCEM-UAalgorithm. J.A.Vrugt TheresultspresentedinTRWwereobtainedusinguniformrandomsamplingofthe initialparameterspace. Suc