王某等人盗窃案的法律评析.pdfVIP

Abstract What is a theft? What is encroachment? What is a duty encroachment? What is corruption? What is unjust enrichment? In judicial practice, the differences of the theoretical basis and practical experience result in different understanding, causing crime and not crime, this crime and those crimes. this article embarks from the judicial practice in a real case, discussing how to affirm the limit between theft and unjust enrichment, how to discriminate concepts of theft and other charges. From the basic details of the case analysis to the contention disputes with its analysis, drawing lessons from both the existing theoretical research results and the fusion of theoretical thinking of my own ,going forward one by one thus it is concluded that this case analysis of conclusion. The first part, introduction. This part includes the reason of writing this article and the significance. The reason why I write is if not had a enough clear understanding of the law, the analysis of the evidence is not clear either, we would indulge crime. The significance is based on the careful analysis of this real case via writing this article, to get a reference in case of meeting such cases in the judicial practice in the future. The second part, the basic situation of the case. It is a introduction to the basic situation, evidence and the contention about the theft case of Wangmou and three other people. In this paper, disagreements on the case is unjust enrichment and the related crime, theft and embezzlement, job occupation crime and corruption. The third part, the legal analysis of the relevant issues. To analyze the legal