数学建模论文写作技巧 论文自评(美赛一等奖获得者从获奖论文评述中总结的经验).doc

数学建模论文写作技巧 论文自评(美赛一等奖获得者从获奖论文评述中总结的经验) 论文自评 Successful teams would have to combine existing models, data, and new ideas in creative and original ways. （成功的队伍会把现有的模型、数据和新的思想创造性地组合起来） Here are some of the issues that kept papers from the final rounds:（以下问题会使得论文无法进入最后一轮评审） ?Errors in mathematics, which quickly took them out of further consideration. （数学上的错误，使他们无法进行更深层次的思考） ?Including mathematics that didn’t fit the flow of the presentation. In a few cases, mathematics appears to have been inserted to make a paper look more credible or to take the place of other work that had led to a dead end. （数学方法被插入论文中是为了使论文看起来更可信 或是取代某些其他的工作 将会使论文被淘汰） ?Changing notation, sometimes even within a single section. (改变符号，有时甚至在同一个章节中) ?Using undefined or poorly defined symbols, or using symbols before defining them. （用没有定义过的符号，或者在定义之前使用它们） ?Incomplete expressions, either because the team made an error or because the expression did not survive the word-processor. (One of the Outstanding papers addressed in this commentary had a few incomplete, probably because they didn’t survive the word-processor, but the coherence of its model and the strength of its presentation overcame that defect.) （不完整的表述） Some models were difficult to understand; poor writing was the most common cause. Another cause was the use of inapposite mathematics. If the mathematics was a result of a “drive-by” insertion, fitting it into the model could be difficult. （一些模型是很难理解,可怜的写作是最常见的原因。另一个原因是使用不合适的数学。如果数学是由于“顺路”插入,拟合模型是很困难的。） Here are a few of the modeling issues that hurt some papers’ chance of entering the final rounds: ?Questionable, conflicting, or unjustifiably speculative assumptions. Good papers did not assume any spherical cows (“a metaphor for highly simplified scientific models of complex real life phenomena” [Wikipedia 2012]). 好论文用高度简化的科学模型复杂的隐喻现实生活现象 ?Dependence ondeus ex machina: an assumption, equation, reference, or procedure invoke