ASSIST Applicability Scoring of Surgical trials. An Investigator-reported aSsessment Tool 英文参考文献.docVIP

ASSIST Applicability Scoring of Surgical trials. An Investigator-reported aSsessment Tool 英文参考文献.doc

  1. 1、本文档共10页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
ASSIST Applicability Scoring of Surgical trials. An Investigator-reported aSsessment Tool 英文参考文献

ASSISTApplicabilityScoringofSurgicaltrials.An Investigator-reportedaSsessmentTool IdrissTourabaly1,2,IsabelleBoutron1*,Re′myNizard2,PhilippeRavaud1 1Inserm,U738,Paris,France;AssistancePubliquedesHo?pitauxDeParis,Ho?pitalHo?telDieu,Centred’e′pide′miologieClinique,Paris,France;UniversityParisDescartes, Sorbonne Paris Cite′, Faculte′ de Me′decine, Paris, France, 2Assistance Publique des Ho?pitaux de Paris, Ho?pital Lariboisie`re, Service de Chirurgie Orthope′dique et Traumatologique,Paris,France;UniversityParisDiderot,SorbonneParisCite′,Faculte′ deMe′decine, Paris,France Abstract Context:Weaimedtodevelopanewtoolforassessinganddepictingtheapplicabilityoftheresultsofsurgicalrandomized controlledtrials(RCTs)fromthetrialinvestigators’perspective. Methods: We identified all items related to applicability by a systematic methodological review, and then a sample of surgeons used these items in a web-based survey to evaluate the applicability of their own trial results. For each applicability item, participants had to indicate on a numerical scale that was simplified as a three-item scale: 1) items essentialtoconsider,2)itemsrequiringattention,and3)itemsinconsequentialtotheapplicabilityoftheresultsoftheir own RCT to clinical practice. For the final tool, we selected only items that were rated as being essential or requiring attention for at least 25% of the trials evaluated. We propose a specific process to construct the tool and to depict applicability in a graph. We identified all investigators of published and registered ongoing RCTs assessing surgery and invitedthemtoparticipateintheweb-basedsurvey. Results:148surgeonsassessedapplicabilityfortheirowntrialandparticipatedintheprocessofitemselection.Thefinal tool contains 22 items (4 dedicated to patients, 5 to centers, 5 to surgeons and 8 to the intervention). We proposed a straightforward process of constructing the graphical tool: 1) a multidisciplinary team of investigators or other care providersparticipatinginthe

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

1234554321 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档