充血性心力衰竭中医证候量表的信度与效度评价.pdfVIP

Abstract significance, the overall reliability is good. ⑶ scale validity: ①content validity: After the four diagnostic methods in data collection, establishment of TCM, K-means clustering and principal component analysis, interviews, expert comment, discussion and repeated measurement test, review and revise, the Congestive heart failure Syndrome Scale was accomplished. It has good representative and content validity.②discriminant validity: Test health people and heart failure patients by T test for each dimension. All dimension P were less than 0.05, except the emotional dimension. The difference between them was significant, since the scale could distinguish the congestive heart failure patients from health people, moreover, the scale has good discriminant validity.③criterion validity :Calculate the correlation coefficients of each dimension about Congestive heart failure Syndrome Scale and the SF-36 quality of life scale. Emotional dimensions of which scale with the SF-36 relative to the dimensions of the correlation coefficient were between 0.29 and 0.53; cold and heat dimension and SF-36 scale in each dimension of the correlation coefficient were between 0.32 and 0.59; The most of other dimensions and the dimensions of SF-36 scales of the correlation coefficient were above 0.5.The correlation of Congestive heart failure Syndrome Scale and the SF-36 quality of life scale is moderate. Conclusion: The overall reliability and validity of the scale is good, could be initially tested in clinical studies Keywords TCM Congestive heart failure scale reliability validity IV 第 1 章 综 述