Production of pragmatic meaning.docVIP

  1. 1、本文档共14页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Production of pragmatic meaning

Production of pragmatic meaning [Abstract] Ferdinand de Saussure had made a distinction between language and speech, which had already attracted the attention of world languages, but in actual teaching, verbal communication is rarely noticed; teaching appears in the language “teaching to die”, “with death “and other phenomena, students are bound on the tools and the lack of books or the literal meaning of resilience, impact communicative exchanges. This article focuses on the pragmatic meaning to talk about the production for the teaching and communication reference. [Keywords:] pragmatic meaning Meaning of Language Speech Communication From linguistics we know what is the meaning and pragmatic meaning of language and their relationship, but we must not only know these, and should know why. So, we need to explore pragmatic meaning generation. A generally pragmatic meaning Pragmatic meaning generation is a rather complex issue, first of all we have to jointly explore a general pragmatic sense, because it is the other basis for the pragmatic meaning. Strictly speaking, the general pragmatic meaning is still a linguistic meaning. 1. The different intonation, resulting in a different pragmatic meaning The different intonation (statement, question, imperative, sigh) table of different pragmatic meaning, even if the same discourse structure, the tone is different from its pragmatic meaning is also different. For example: “You wear Han ↗, he was wearing Han ↗?” Can answer: “I wear a uniform, he was wearing a suit.” “You wear Han ↗, he was wearing Han ↘?” May be said: “He’s old and you learn.” “You wear Han ↗, he was wearing Han ↗?” May also be said: “You dress better than him.” 2. Different tone, resulting in a different pragmatic meaning Indicative mood, often the views of the table shows, a statement of fact. Doubt that the tone of a non-Q indicated that a particular issue is completely unknown to the pragmatic meaning; choose asked

文档评论(0)

jiupshaieuk12 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:6212135231000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档