有关适者生存.doc

  1. 1、本文档共8页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
有关适者生存

适者生存 赫伯特·斯宾塞创造了适者生存的新词 适者生存(英语:survival of the fittest)是英语的片语,是以竞争争取生存或优势之概念的总结。此概念由赫伯特·斯宾塞在1864年于其著作《生物原理》 (Principles of Biology) 提出。斯氏借此将他的经济学思想与达尔文的演化理论相较;而达尔文就把适者生存之概念称为自然选择。 此片语乃一种隐喻,并非科学描述;生物学家一般不用此片语,而只是称之为自然选择。 Evolution and Philosophy Does evolution make might right? by John S. Wilkins John S. Wilkins Copyright ? 1997 Summary: Evolution does not have moral consequences, and does not make cosmic purpose impossible. number of critics see the use of selection theory in other than biological contexts as forcing malign political and moral commitments. A prime example of this is sociobiology, which is supposed to result in such things as eugenics, racism, and the death of the welfare state. Sociobiology, and the more recent evolutionary psychology movement, seeks to explain human behavior in terms of the adaptations of human evolution. Gould especially has been vitriolic in his attacks on socio-biological explanations. It is thought by some to result in a completely selfish ethic known as rational egoism. Another such view is Social Darwinism, which holds that social policy should allow the weak and unfit to fail and die, and that this is not only good policy but morally right. The only real connection between Darwinism and Social Darwinism is the name. The real source of Social Darwinism is Herbert Spencer and the tradition going back to Hobbes via Malthus, not Darwins own writings, though Darwin gained some inspiration on the effects of population growth from Malthus. The claims made by Social Darwinists and their heirs suffer from the ethical fallacy known as the naturalistic fallacy (no connection to naturalism in explanations and the study of knowledge mentioned above). This is the inference from what may be the case to the conclusion that it is therefore right. However, while it is certainly true that, for example, some families are prone to suffer diabetes, as mine is, there is no licence to conclude that they should not be treated, any more than the fa

文档评论(0)

f8r9t5c + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:8000054077000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档