“四化论”严重干扰了大学学报使命的履行.pdfVIP

［31 ］宗源瀚，等修. 周学濬，等纂. 湖州府志［M ］. 影印本. 台 ［33 ］王耒贤，许一德，纂修. 万历贵州通志［M ］. 北京：书目文 北：成文出版社有限公司，1970. 献出版社，1991. ［32 ］薛应旂，撰. 浙江通志［M ］. 台北：成文出版社有限公司， ［34 ］于慎行. 谷城山馆文集［M ］. 济南：齐鲁书社，1997. 1983. ［35 ］吴国伦. 甔甀洞稿［M ］. 济南：齐鲁书社，1997. A Brief Chronological Life of Wu Weiyue SHI Xiao-jun, YANG Ya-meng (College of Liberal Arts, Ji ’nan University, Guangzhou 510632, China) Abstract: Wu Weiyue was a famous litterateur, strategist and statesman in the Jiajing period of the Ming Dynasty. As the magistrate of Jangyin county, he was in charge of the Ministry of Punishments and as a ministry councilor, he was in charge of the Ministry of War. Later he became a deputy educational inspector of Shandong province, a judge of Jiangxi province and a grand coordinator of Guizhou province respectively. He made remarkable political achievements and also had a large circle of friends. And he was well versed in literature, especially being profi⁃ cient in poetry. Therefore, Wu Weiyue was recorded as one of “the five writers of the Literary Revival Movement in the Ming Dynasty”by Wang Shizhen, the leader of the School of Houqizi. Key words: Wu Wei-yue; the Ming Dynasty; chronology “四化论”严重干扰了大学学报使命的履行 “大学学报使命”这个根本性、灵魂性的问题，在学报“四化”（专业化、数字化、去同质化和特色化）论 看来好像时过境迁，然而事实并非如此。学报“四化论”严重干扰了大学学报使命的履行。学报究竟是专 业化还是综合化，取决于主办者学术平台的情况，不以学报编辑意志为转移；而学报数字化课题应属于IT 行业的、自然科学的问题，不是学报编辑的分内事；学报“去同质化”显然荒唐，因为学术追求的是真理，而 真理是人们对客观事物纷繁复杂的表象背后的共同的、本质规律的认识，是普遍的、共性的结论，这是难 以避免“同质化”的，学术探索如此，其成果展示的载体——学报就没有理由“去同质化”；学报特色化则与 去同质化如出一辙。学报“四化”论的本质就是鼓励各家学报不遗余力、无序地在国内拼抢有限的学术资 源——稿源，其本质是朝三暮四，它不可能使国家科学、文化、技术成果总体上得到质的升华和量的增 加。因此，科研本末不能倒置，学术也不以编辑意志为转移；大学学报仅是学术成果展示的平台，应当回 归本位，依附于各自的学术平台，履行学报应有的使命。（摘自尹玉吉、石学军、杨爽《关于