对比分析氧驱动雾化吸入与空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗小儿哮喘的临床效果.pdfVIP

CHINESE COMMUNITY DOCTORS 论著·临床论坛 对比分析氧驱动雾化吸入与空气压缩泵雾化吸入 治疗小儿哮喘的临床效果 王慧琴 王天锁 李冰 452470 河南省登封市人民医院儿科 doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-614x.2016.15.20 摘 要 目的：比较空气压缩泵雾化吸入与氧驱动雾化吸入治疗小儿哮喘的临床疗效。方法：收治哮喘患儿 70 例， 均行雾化吸入治疗，依据雾化装置划分为两组，对照组 35 例行空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗，观察组 35 例行氧驱动雾化 吸入治疗，对比两组临床效果。结果：对照组临床总有效率 74.3%，低于观察组的 94.3%(P ＜0.05) 。结论：氧驱动 雾化吸入相较于空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗小儿哮喘临床效果更优。 关键词 氧驱动雾化吸入；空气压缩泵雾化吸入；小儿哮喘 Comparative analysis of the clinical effect of oxygen atomizing inhalation and air compression pump in the treatment of children asthma Wang Huiqin,Wang Tiansuo,Li Bing Department of Pediatrics,the People’s Hospital of Dengfeng City in Henan Province 452470 Abstract Objective:To compare the clinical effect of oxygen atomizing inhalation and air compression pump in the treatment of children asthma.Methods:70 patients with asthma were selected.All were treated with aerosol inhalation.According to the atomization device they were divided into two groups.35 cases in the control group were treated by air compressor pump atomizing inhalation.35 cases in the observation group were treated with oxygen driven atomizing inhalation.The clinical effect of the two groups were compared.Results:The total effective rate of the control group was 74.3%,lower than 94.3% of the observation group(P ＜0.05).Conclusion:The clinical effect of oxygen driven atomizing inhalation in treatment of children asthma is better than that of air compression pump. Key words Oxygen driven atomizing inhalation;Air compressor pump atomizing inhalation;Asthma in children 支气管哮喘为儿科常见疾病，因 所有患儿均符合中华医学会制定的《儿 d。治疗前后监测两组患儿血氧饱和度。 小儿支气管生理特点与解剖特点比较 童支气管哮喘诊断与防治指南》中的诊 疗效判定标准：依据《儿童支气管 独特，气道的高反应性使得患儿敏感于 断标准[1] ，临床表现为胸闷、咳嗽、喘 哮喘诊断与防治指南》判定临床疗效[2] ： 各类变应原，因此多种诱因会导致患儿