GMAT逻辑More about入门.docVIP

GMAT逻辑More about入门 对于很多备考GMAT逻辑的人来说，如何备考GMAT才能顺利通过GMAT逻辑考试呢?下面就是关于GMAT备考中的一些关于逻辑备考的经验分享，希望对大家能有所帮助。 　　Intermediate Conclusions 　　Sometime an argument has more than one conclusion. The following is an example: 　　Because Ming Li went to PekingUniversity, he is smart. Therefore, he is likely to get a high score in GMAT. 　　The first thing you would notice is that there are two indicators in the above argument – because and therefore. The former leads to a premise and the latter, a conclusion. Secondly, the first sentence is an argument by itself since it contains both a premise (Because Ming Li went to Peking University) and a conclusion (he is smart). Thirdly, the conclusion (he is smart) of the first argument is used to support the second sentence, which is the main conclusion. To put it another way, the clause “he is smart” is both a conclusion (in the 1st sentence) and a premise (in the overall argument.) 　　In CR tests, a dual-role clause like this is called an “intermediate” or “subsidiary” conclusion. It is not the main point of the overall argument, but it is still a conclusion. 　　Keep in mind that you have to find the main conclusion of an argument in CR test. Do not be fooled by an intermediate conclusion along the way. Use the “because” test if in doubt. 　　Background Information 　　Some CR questions are not pure arguments. They might also include background information, which, by definition, helps you understand the flow of the argument, but does not contain a premise or a conclusion. 　　For example, an opinion of a critic or a committee is common in background information: 　　Editor: Many graduates from Peking University believe they can easily land a white-collar job after graduation. But they are wrong. A survey between 2000 and 2010 shows that more than 10% of Peking University Graduates during the last decade have no job offers within 6 months of their graduation. 　　The first sentence is neither a premise nor a conclusion. It is the opinion of “ma