中美规范下大跨径梁桥混凝土结合面收缩效应比较.pdfVIP

学兔兔 第31卷第5期 土 木 建 筑 与 环 境 工 程 Journal of Civil．Architectural Environmental Engineering Vo1．31 No．5 2009年 1O月 0ct．2OO9 中美规范下大跨径梁桥混凝土结合面收缩效应比较 李小祥，石雪飞，阮 欣，冯电视 (同济大学桥梁工程系，上海 200092) 摘 要：基于中国和美国规范，研究了因混凝土龄期不同而带来的收缩特性差异对大跨径连续刚构 桥典型结合面部位混凝土应力分布的影响，并分析了2种规范下计算结果存在较大差异的原因。 结果表明：对于厚度大的混凝土构件，AASHTO规范的收缩效应计算结果更加合理。当浇筑时间 间隔较长时，结合面部位混凝土极易开裂。而依据JTGD 62—2004规范，混凝土不同浇筑时间间 隔下，结合面的应力始终较小，而截面突变位置的应力相对更为明显。有必要对JTGD 62—2004 中理论厚度规定一上限，建议h≤300 n-in。还提出了一些避免此类裂缝的设计和施工对策。 关键词：大跨径连续刚构桥；有限元；混凝土结合面；收缩；浇筑时间间隔；规范 中图分类号：U448．23 文献标志码：A 文章编号：1674 4764(2009)05—0086—04 Comparison on Shrinkage Effects at Concrete Interfaces in Long-Span Girder Bridges between Chinese and American Codes LI Xiao—xiang，SHI Xue—fei，RUAN Xin，FENG Dian—shi (Dept．of Bridge Engineering，Tongji Univ，Shanghai 200092，P．R．China) Abstract：Stress，due to shrinkage characteristic difference resulting from different concrete age at typical interface parts in long span rigid frame bridges，was analyzed based on Chinese and American codes． Reasons for large discrepancy between results under the two codes were also discussed．It was shown that shrinkage stress leve1 calculated under AASHTO was more reasonable than that under Chinese code(JTGD 62—2004)for concrete members with large thickness．Concrete at interface parts was easy to crack when casting time interval was long．According to JTGD 62—2004，stress at interfaces was always small under different casting time intervals，while stress at position with mutation section was more significant．It was necess