马鞍山长江公路大桥三塔悬索桥结构体系选择.pdfVIP

学兔兔 马鞍山长江公路大桥三塔悬索桥结构体系选择 唐贺强，张 强，杨光武 文章编号：1003—4722(2011)01—0005—05 马鞍山长江公路大桥三塔悬索桥结构体系选择 唐贺强，张 强，杨光武 (中铁大桥勘测设计院有限公司，湖北 武汉430056) 摘 要：马鞍山长江公路大桥左汉主桥为主跨2×1 080 m的三塔悬索桥，为解决该桥在不平 衡活载作用下引起中塔两侧主缆缆力差值较大的问题，需要选择合理的结构体系，对塔梁固结、支 座约束、半飘浮与全飘浮4种结构体系进行对比分析。采用有限元软件 BNLAS分析4种结构体 系的力学特性，计算结果表明：塔梁固结结构体系抗滑安全系数最高、结构刚度最大、中塔钢结构段 应力在容许范围内、抗风与抗震性能优于飘浮体系、不需要设置支座；4种结构体系在缆索受力方 面差异很小；塔梁固结体系加劲梁受力较大但可以通过调整梁高来控制应力。经综合比选，该三塔 悬索桥最终采用塔梁固结的结构体系。 关键词：悬索桥；结构体系；固结；计算分析；刚度；稳定性 中图分类号：U448．25；U442．54 文献标志码：A Selection of Structural System for Three‘_Tower Suspension Bridge of Maanshan Changj iang River Highway Bridge TANG He—qiang，ZHANG Qiang，YANG Guang—WU (China Railway Major Bridge Reconnaissance Design Institute Co．，Ltd．，Wuhan 430056，China) Abstract：The main bridge of Maanshan Changj iang River H ighway Bridge over the left branch is a three—tower suspension bridge with main span arrangement 2 X 1 080 m．To resolve the problem of considerable cable force differences of the main cables at either side of the interme— diate tower of the bridge due to the action of unbalanced load，the rational structural system should be appropriately selected．Four types of the structural systems of the tower—to—girder rigid fixity，bearing restraint，semi-floating and complete floating are compared and analyzed and the finite element software BNLAS iS used tO analyze the mechanical behavior of the structural sys— terns．The results of calculation indicate that the slip resistance safety coefficient of the tower—to— girder rigid fixity system is the highest and the structural rigidity is the greatest．The stress in the part of ste