扁平化设计 vs 拟物化设计(国外英文资料).docVIP

扁平化设计 vs 拟物化设计(国外英文资料) Objectification design vs. flat design Chemical design, the visual aesthetic feeling, give a person a kind of engagement, when visual objects, and operations in accordance with the imitation of objects in the real world and operation, users can quickly grasp how to use it. It adds some features of the object to the design, even though these features dont have any functional requirements. The objectification design approach sometimes reduces user experience. Using simulation and chemical design, will try to imitate a real goods appearance and function, also to a certain extent, give up the unique advantages of digital media, make simulation to give full play to the constrained. And, in a different way, the confusion arises when the user is operating in a physical way and is not getting the right feedback. This will directly affect the products user experience, a so-called the uncanny valley phenomenon (the uncanny valley: in 1970 by the Japanese roboticist sen chang hong, when the robot and mankind alike more than 95% of the time, even if she has a little difference with the human, will appear very conspicuous and harsh, let whole robot is very stiff, let a person feel in the face of the walking dead). When you learn from reference design elements, but also inevitably the limitations to the product of the reference, even if these restrictions have no reason to exist. For a product designed to be objectified, if done well enough, the product will resonate strongly in the visual world. But at the same time, the advantages of the quasi materialized design as well as the disadvantage: the stronger the resonance, the more like real goods, it brings limitations are increasingly clear, it also hindered the improvement of products and innovation. Although there are some problems with the objectification design, we still need to interact with the device in a human way. Design style is just a tool, the ultimate goal is the key. The flat design, which em