国际商法案例剖析题(国外英文资料).docVIP

国际商法案例分析题(国外英文资料)Case problem1. On June 27, 2007, the Chinese company, at the request of the Dutch company quote us C514 200 metric tons, of a primary product CIF1920 dollars per metric ton, Rotterdam, a FIRM OFFER for prompt shipment (the FIRM OFFER). After receiving this offer, the other party has not made a commitment (ACCEPTANCE), only asking China to increase the quantity, lower the price, and extend the validity of the firm offer. The Chinese side will increase the number to 300 metric tons, and the price will be reduced to $1,900 per metric ton, and the two extended periods will be extended until July 25. The Dutch merchant called on July 22. But found that when the other call is rich in the country of the product due to severe natural disasters affect the yield of the product, in the international market prices of the products. China refused to sell the product to the Dutch company, citing the sale of the product.Q: (1). What is the reason for China to be binding on the Chinese side?(2). The buyer received the Chinese offer on July 22, why?China refuses to sell the product for legal liability. Why?(4) if you are a judge or arbitrator, how do you decide or decide the case?6. The company A wants to sell A commodity imports from other countries to our country company B, A to B for this offer. B complex within the validity period of the offer: , please provide the certificate of origin. in response, A did not answer. Later, A received B from the l/c terms required to provide certificate of origin in the l/c documents. Because the goods is not their products in the United States, the relevant authorities in the United States cannot issue A certificate of origin. So, A call B to cancel the certificate of origin in the letter of credit, which has been rejected, causing the dispute between the two parties. A company said it had never agreed to provide the certificate of origin, so the contract was not established; B: the company insists that the two parties have rea