电压缩式制冷循环与吸收式制冷循环的热力学比较分析.pdfVIP

专题研讨 95 眼.i!D唯调 HVAC 2012 年第42 在第8 期 电压缩去制冷循环与阪仪式制冷 循环的热刀学比较公衍 清华大学冯丽沽食付林张世钢江亿 摘要 采用调效率与调损失分析方法，计算比较了电压缩式和i 冷循环与单效吸收式制冷循环 的娴效率及两种制冷循环在典型工况下各环节的调损失。结果表明，当采用合适的发生器温度和 热源温度时，两种制冷循环的娴效率基本相同;电压缩式制冷循环的主要佣损失发生在压缩机环 节，吸收式制冷循环的主要调损失发生在吸收器和发生器。讨论了两种制冷循环的改进途径。 关键词 电压缩式制冷循环吸收式制冷循环娴效率烟损失 Thermodynamical comparison and analysis of electric con、 pression refrigeration cycle and 。bsorption refrigeration cycle By Feng Llj le食 ， Fu LI门 ， Zhong Shlgong ond JlOng γI Abstract Applying the exergy efficiency and exergy 1值s analysis method. calculates and compar臼 the exergy efficiency between the electric ∞mpression refrigeration cycIe and the single-effect absorption refrigeration cycIe and the exergy losses of each part of the two cycI臼 under the typical condition. The results show that the exergy efficiency of the two cycIes is basically the same when the generator temperature and the heat sour四 temperature are appropriately selected; m臼t part of exercy 1ω能s of the electric ∞mpr臼sion refrigeration cycIeα:cur in the compressor. and most part of exercy 1ωses of the single-effect absorption refrigeration c严le occur in 中e abso阳and generator. Discusses the improving meth创s for the two cycIes. Keywords electric ωmpression refrigeration cycIe. absorption refrigeration cycle. exergyefficiency. exergy loss 食 Tsi咱hua 山iversity. Beijing. China 0 引言 的佣损失的详细剖析也较少，不能深入反映佣损失 在各个循环环节的分配情况及造成两种循环烟损 电压缩式制冷循环是目前应用最广泛的制冷 失的原因和区别。文献[7J 比较了电压缩式制冷循 方式，利用电能做功制冷，大型机组的α)p 可达到