环评与安评外延之辩-中英对照版.ppt

* * The Institutional Perfection of EIA and SA as well as the Distinction between their Extensions（环评与安评外延之辩及制度完善） Xi-Sheng Huang ——A Reflection on the Tianjin Port Explosion Accident （基于天津港爆炸事故的省思） CHONGQING UNIVERSITY Clarifying the Extensions —— What are the Difference Between EIA SA? （外延厘清——环评与安评的差异明晰） Institutional Defects —— the Co-existence of Repeated and Unilateral Assessment （制度缺陷——重复评价与片面评价并存） III Legislative Perfection —— Establishing the Integrated Risk Assessment Expert Consulting System （立法完善——建立综合风险评价专家咨询制度） IV Cause of Debate ——What Happened in Tianjin Port? （争辩的产生——天津港发生了什么） I II Contents * 1.1 Where is TianJin in China（天津的地理位置） Tianjin * 1.1 Scene of the Tianjin port explosion accident （天津港爆炸事故的场景） Taken by XinJing Paper in August 12, 2015 Casualties （人员伤亡） Property loss （财产损失） 1.1 The Consequences of the Accident （事故的损害后果） 165 dead 8 missing 798 injured 304 buildings damaged 12428 cars were destroyed 7533 container damaged Direct economic loss of 1 billion dollars. （直接经济损失近10亿美金） * Explosion shock wave range （爆炸冲击波影响范围） The nearest residential area （最近的居民小区） 600 meters 1.1 Circumstances Surrounding the Explosion （爆炸仓库的周边情况） Explosive warehouse * 1.2 Who is Responsible for This Accident According to Chinese law, hazardous chemicals warehouse should be kept more than 1000 meters away from the residential area. （根据法律规定，危化品仓库应与居民小区保持1000米以上的距离） While the exploded storage warehouse is only 600 meters away from the nearest residential area. the point is, the Environmental Impact Report states that “the project location is feasible”, which has caused huge public condemn on the EIA (Enivronmental impact assessment). （然而，爆炸的仓库与居民小区仅600米。重点是，该项目的环评报告书结论却是“项目选址合理可行”，由此引发民众对环评的口诛笔伐） * 1.2 Who is Responsible for This Accident However, specialists who corrected that “the responsibility for this accident goes to SA (Safety assessment).”（随后有专家纠正，此次事故的责任归安评） Why the public has been confused between EIA and SA? （公众为何会对环评与安评产生混淆） What is the connection betwee