【夏宏】形式语用学的当代哲学意义(国外英文资料).docVIP

【夏宏】形式语用学的当代哲学意义 [xia hong] the contemporary philosophical meaning of formal pragmatics Habermas published an article in 1976, what is hei beta t Universalpragmatik? His first note in this article points out that his language philosophy is more appropriate in the form of Formalpragmatik. In later the communicative action theory , metaphysics, and other important work, he put his own philosophy of language is called formal pragmatics, its goal is to identify and reconstruct about words can understand common conditions. Pragmatics is not only a product occurs after the linguistic turn of philosophy, but also internal once again turned to language philosophy, habermas pragmatics in the form of not only expanded the research field of speech act theory, expand the peoples understanding of language to express meaning, but also reveal the contained in the language of rational communicative rationality, and expand the content of research on the theory of life world. First, we expanded the field of research on the theory of speech behavior Saussure, a Swiss linguist, first distinguished between language and speech. He thinks that people can to normative language for scientific and rational analysis and research, and as an individual phenomenon of words is not normative analysis. The practice of saussures distinction between language and speech affected later many linguistic schools, such as semantics, language learning, etc. Basically inherited the saussures dichotomy. However, represented by the late wittgenstein, Austin and searles daily language analytic philosophy, on the contrary, in their view, words can also be as specific performance and application of normative analysis. Late wittgenstein in thought, leave the language of daily use and isolated one-sided inspects the meaning of the language, just like leave the use of tools for the significance of inspection tools, difficult to really understand the language. The meaning of language expression is rooted in human lif