GMAT写作题库范文(五十六)-智课教育.pdfVIP

智 课 网 G M A T 备 考 资 料 GMAT写作题库范文（五十六）-智课教育 写作是个厚积薄发的考试，同学们在备考GMAT写作时，不仅要多 练习，也要去掌握一些重点语句。有些题库范文是需要大家掌握并且熟 练记忆的，熟记于心才能运用自如，才能举一反三。接下来小编就给大 家介绍一下GMAT写作范文，希望对大家备考GMAT写作考试有帮助。 56. The following appeared as part of an article in a popular arts and leisure magazine. “The safety codes governing the construction of public buildings are becoming far too strict. The surest way for architects and builders to prove that they have met the minimum requirements established by these codes is to construct buildings by using the same materials and methods that are currently allowed. But doing so means that there will be very little significant technological innovation within the industry, and hence little evolution of architectural styles and design—merely because of the strictness of these safety codes.” Discuss how well reasoned... etc. 一份流行休闲杂志上的文章： 监控公共建筑物的安全条例(code?)已经变得太严格了。对建筑师 和施工者来说最可靠的证实他们满足这些条例带来的最小的要求的方法 是使用当前允许的同样的材料和技术来建造建筑。这样 ，仅仅因为安全 条例的严格，行业内将几乎没有技术革新 ，因此也就没有建筑风格和设 计的变化。 The conclusion of this argument is that technological innovation as well as the evolution of architectural styles and design will be minimized in the future. The author’s line of reasoning is that the imposition of strict safety codes on public buildings inhibits the evolution of architectural styles and design, because they discourage technological innovation within the building industry. Furthermore, the strictness of the codes governing public buildings discourages technological innovation because the surest way for architects and builders to pass the codes is to construct buildings that use the same materials and methods that are currently allowed. This argument is unconvincing for two reasons. In the first place, the author’s conclusion goes beyond the evidence presented. The evidence cited pertains only to the construction of public buildings, yet the author draws a co