- 1、本文档共11页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
不同入路手术治疗脊柱结核的对比研究
不同入路手术治疗脊柱结核的对比研究 【摘要】 目的 探讨理想的脊柱结核的外科手术治疗方案
方法 回顾性分析2012年5月至2014年5月行手术治疗的脊柱结核患者53例,所有患者均采用一期病灶清除植骨内固定术治疗。按照入路方法不同分为前入路组(n=27)和后入路组(n=26),观察两组手术时间、术中出血量、并发症、神经功能恢复情况、术后1年Cobb角平均值、影像学评价和功能评价等
结果 后入路组术后1年Cobb角平均值小于前入路组(P0.05);两组影像学评分优良率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.574,P0.05);两组功能评分优良率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.148,P0.05)
结论 在治疗脊柱结核手术中,前路或者后路病灶清除植骨内固定术均可取得良好的疗效
【关键词】 脊柱结核;入路;疗效
中图分类号:R529.2 文献标识码:A DOI:10.3969/j.issn2015.05.004
A comparative study on effects of different surgical approaches in the treatment of patients with spinal tuberculosis
QIAO Ningning1,TANG Yujin2,XIE Kegong2,PAN Shengcai2,LU Lu2,HUANG Ke2,LIN Jiajie2
(1.Graduate School of Guilin Medical University,Guilin 541000;2.Department of Spinal Orthopedic Surgery,Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities,Baise 533000,Guangxi,China)
【Abstract】 Objective To explore ideal surgical treatment for spinal tuberculosis.
Methods Clinical data of 53 spinal tuberculosis patients who underwent operation during May,2012 to May,2014 were retrospectively analyzed.All patients who were treated with onestage radical debridement,bone grafting and internal fixation,were divided into anterior approach group (n=27) and posterior approach group (n=26).Then,operative time,intraoperative blood loss,complications,recovery of neurological function,average value of Cobb angle one year after surgery,imaging evaluation and function evaluation of the two groups were compared.
Results The average value of Cobb angle one year after surgery in the posterior approach group was smaller than that in the anterior approach group(P0.05). In addition,difference of excellent and good rate of imaging evaluation scores was not statistically significant between groups(χ2=0.574,P0.05),so was difference of excellent and good rate of function evaluation(χ2=0.148,P0.05).
Conclusion Both anterior and posterior radical debridement,bone grafting and internal fixation are viable surgical options for spinal tu
文档评论(0)