ToleranceManagement(公差管理).pptVIP

Tolerance Management 31 July, 2002 Agilent Restricted Process Capability Cp Cpk Tolerance Management 31 July, 2002 Agilent Restricted Explanation Cp1.0 Process is too bad 1.0Cp1.33 Good 1.33Cp2.0 Better Cp is the index of process capability, Cpk is the index of process control Cp= 2.0 and Cpk=1.5 imply 6 SIGMA quality (3.4ppm defective,) Tolerance Management 31 July, 2002 Agilent Restricted Best Practice Motorola 6 Sigma Taguchi’s Method Conception Design Parameter Design Tolerance Design Tolerance Management 31 July, 2002 Agilent Restricted Variations causing component failure 5M1E Man, Method,Machine Measuring Tool,Material, Environment Variations in different product phase Phase Design Component Assembly Variation Design is not robust, too sensible to variation Machine precision Process variation Manufacturing process Fixture precision Assembly process Calibration tool precision Process variation Result Tolerance is too tight, high manufacturing cost. High defect on arrival, scrap rate is too high DOA,High Failure Rate,Shorten product life Tolerance Management 31 July, 2002 Agilent Restricted Design Manufacturing Inspection Vendor Management Fixture Development Assembly Process Development Calibration Process Development Tolerance Management Activities in Different Phase Tolerance Management 31 July, 2002 Agilent Restricted Design Phase Robust design Sensitivity analysis and optimization Manufacturing method? Balance between assembly tolerance and component tolerance Build high precision or manufacturing high precision? Fixture and compliant assembly can ensure tight tolerance. Example:Injector Back plate Assembly tolerance or calibrated tolerance? If a product has high repeatability,product can be calibrated to home point,avoiding high manufacturing cost. Example: Tray and injector Tolerance Management 31 July, 2002 Agilent Restricted Tolerance Management 31 July, 2002 Agilent Restricted Manufacturing Fixture design Use correct positioning metho