剽窃与模拟(国外英语资料).doc

抄袭与模仿(国外英语资料) Plagiarism and imitation Put together, because this is the most difficult to separate a pair, the most difficult to judge a pair, and more importantly, plagiarism is derogatory, is bad behavior, and imitation is neutral. Or plagiarism is absolutely negative, can be ruthless contempt, and imitation is relatively positive, from the emotional can be accepted and forgive. The question is how to distinguish? Its difficult to distinguish, and sometimes only designers know whether they copy or imitate. Look through the dictionary, the dictionary explanation is: [plagiarism] copy of others as their own. [imitate] do as they are ready. In fact, it is not clear, for learning, there is no plagiarism and imitation. But for the application, copy and copy performance is almost the same, how to distinguish between Na? Some time ago, when designing a sea word, you need to select three icons for text export, HTML export, and XML export. What icons do you use? Think about it, find a picture, this is Windows Vistas own Notepad icon, as the text export icon. At the same time, extract the IE7 and FF file icons, the problem comes, the size of the two signs, location and background is not uniform, and after shrinking color is impure. So I got three more pictures:,,. Narrow them separately to avoid confusion of colors. Re assembled and unified position:,. Icons exported as html. XML exported icons? Well done, draw lines with dots and figures, and place them in the same setting: Well, now, the process is really a good example: the text export icons are copied, and the two icons exported by HTML are imitations, and the XML exported icons have some flavor for reference. Lets compare the overall effect:. If all ready icons are available, it may be done in five or ten minutes. I copied some of them and used them more than a few times. Is it worth it? I think its worth! Maybe some people dont mind the difference, but I do. For example, a pot of white fish soup if drop into a drop