从关联理论的角度看翻译中的语境问题论文.docVIP

　　从关联理论的角度看翻译中的语境问题论文 Abstract Sperber and any translators realize that one should never understand a single ple illustration may make the point clear. (4) “Out in the en are men”. These ten” any people if the background or the situation of this phrase used is not clear. And if people do not knoen” refer to Chinese en ployed to look after cattle in the ost of the contextual factors are developing, and all the developing factors ents of context. As any ponents forming the context, and these contextual ponents are “the pool of shared knoportant to understand the utterance or text. But not all the contextual ponents can be seen as context, only those closely relate to the current munication can form the context. Professor Liu Huanhui pointed out that all the probable contextual ponents, objective or subjective, the context if they lose the relevance to the linguistic munication. ”. 16 monly, people regard the linguistic munication as a r process of circular, unication is a process of tunication is a continuously developing process. 17 Every success in information and meaning transformation means that the munication isunderstand of the other participator’s intentional meaning, the munication unication is dynamic, the precious information is the foreation, and then the latter information bees the foreation. In this unication is developing. Hence, context is a dynamic concept as unication. In the perspective of pragmatics, “static context is by no means unimportant, but ore importance to dynamic context, because munication is based on interactive meaning generation and interpretation on the one hand, and on dynamic negotiation and interpretation of context on the other, and all munication starts from a certain relevant given context, and folloodel, dynamically and effectively arrives at the invisible implicit premise and implicit conclusion.” 18 Actually, the process of understanding an utterance or a text is a process of context proposition and selection. The hearer