虚伪通谋意思表示及的其法律后果.docVIP

虚伪通谋意思表示及其法律后果 【】 虚伪通谋意思表示（或称虚伪表示、虚假行为）是大陆法系民法中的特有概念，是法律行为意思表示瑕疵中故意不一致的一种情形。针对虚伪通谋意思表示所反映的客观行为及其法律后果，大陆法系各国都作了相应规定，但不尽相同。此中存有诸多疑问和分歧，既源于民法理论背景的差异，也因为各国具体国情的不同，诚如萨维尼所言：法律是民族精神、民族特征和民族共同意识的体现，带有一个民族鲜明的特色。 学者论及虚伪通谋意思表示，常以德国、日本、台湾等国家地区法律为例进行比较研究。这些国家同采潘德克顿法学派五编制的民法立法体例，法律思想融合度较高，对虚伪通谋意思表示的规定也十分相近。我国自清末以来，不断向大陆法系靠近，尤其民国时期立法更是如此。虽新中国成立后也受到苏联的影响，但法学理论界和实务界对大陆法系的制度、思想并不陌生。改革开放以来，我国立法逐渐摆脱苏联影响，对大陆法系的研究日益深入，成果斐然。本文也将就上述国家关于虚伪通谋意思表示的规定比较研究。同属大陆法系的法国对虚伪通谋所指向的行为的规定与以上国家、地区不同，但同样颇具启示意义，本文将通过介绍法国民法中的“舞弊理论”阐述其对这一现象的独特规制方法。 本文旨在通过对德国、法国、苏联及我国台湾地区对虚伪通谋行为不同规定的比较讨论，分析我国现行民法相关规定并剖析其不足，在此基础上尝试给出可行的立法建议，使之更符合当下的社会发展和国情民情。 【关键词】虚伪通谋比较研究舞弊理论立法缺陷与建议 Disingenuous conspired representation and its legal force Abstract Disingenuous conspired representation (or hypocrisy, false behavior) is a unique concept in the civil law of Continental Legal System, which is one kind of deliberate variance between intention and expression of juristic act. For the objective behavior and legal consequences which is reflected by Disingenuous Conspired Representation, civil law countries have made the different provisions.It’s due to the differences of theoretical background, as well as specific conditions of different countries. Savigny once said: The law is the reflection of national spirit, identity and common consciousness with distinct national characteristics. Scholars have always made comparative researches among Germany,Japan, Taiwan and other countries and regions. Since the late Qing Dynasty, China’s legal system is getting close to the civil law. Though affected by Soviet Union, china is no stranger to the system and thought of civil law, and has deepened the study of it since the reform and opening up. This paper will compare the provisions of the above-mentioned countries on Disingenuous Conspired Representation, meanwhile introduce the fraud theory in the French civil law. This paper aims to discuss over the different provisions about disingenuous conspired representation in civil law of Germany, Fran