实践的分野(国外英语资料).docVIP

实践的分野(国外英语资料) What difference will it make? Obviously, the answer to the first question is yes we can recover the veil, Dekunin has already done so; the answer to the second question is that doing so may cause very different, as Dekunins paintings look very different from mondrian. Once we realize this, then all we need to do is to think about how this difference in painting might resonate in other aspects of existence. [4] Resonance is the interpretation of TOE (universal theory), different is the interpretation of Pickerings ontology creation: Pickerings ontology is generated, something new is how to grow out from the old things, and do not have to revert to the old [5], new things are heterogeneous, equality, to the center, is on research and historical research methods for ordinary scientific practice of scientific research activities, scientific work that we need to balance the image of science. These studies no longer regard scientific theory and knowledge about the world, characterized in our representation of the center, but suggested that we should discern the interaction of Science in all aspects of society, such as material, characterization, and there is no need for any one of them to provide the center stage. My article is about clarifying what is necessary in the trade-off of scientific image, and pointing out some interesting directions that it may lead to [6]. A new ontology is an alliance, social factors is not a stable explanatory variable; people love any human or social variables to say interest in the production process in the overnight, and easy transformation, as well as knowledge itself. So society and matter as well as concepts, are themselves part of this delicate and uncertain process of alliance, [7]. Pickering accused the mainstream of the discipline of covering up the interaction between man and thing. That is, it conceals the true ontology, and expounds that natural science has a pure ontology of matter, and that social science also ha