新婚姻法动了谁的奶酪(国外英语资料).doc

新婚姻法动了谁的奶酪(国外英语资料) Whose cheese is the new marriage law? Marriage is a romantic and serious word. There are too many topics to think about. Recently, the Supreme Court issued several interpretations of the law on marriage in Peoples Republic of China, interpretation three, which interfered with the ownership of married property in the form of law. Two of them caught my attention. The one who has a spouse living with others, agreed property compensation for the cohabitation relationship, a request to pay for the compensation or payment of compensation claim back the return, the peoples court shall not support, people call this provision is with a mistress. The one party before marriage signed a real estate purchase contract, to pay the first payment of personal property and in bank loans, after the real estate registration for the first payment of the name of the party, divorce can be identified as the property rights of immovable personal property loans have not yet returned to the real estate the rights of the individual debt. In addition, explain the three also stipulates that the marriage from a parent funded the purchase of real estate, property registered in the name of the children of the people, can be regarded as a donation to their children, finds that the real estate as the wifes personal property. The provisions of Article 1 in fact I agree, but the provisions of this article is the mistress, problem is actually not that compensation is not the issue of compensation, we must first pursue is nurturing mistress is not a crime, is not to crack down on the problem. It is clear that the new judicial interpretation does not have this provision. And I think the third child belongs to bigamy, which is a violation of the legal marriage, and is subject to severe punishment. However, the present new interpretation is only a unilateral deprivation of the rights and interests of the subordinate, and there is no legal confirmation of the substantive conduct of the two