清疆域最大靠是满族“汉化”还是“满洲认同”？56323(国外英语资料).docVIP

清疆域最大靠是满族“汉化”还是“满洲认同”？56323(国外英语资料) Core tip: it starts with a debate. In 1967, He Bingdi published the Qing Dynastys importance in Chinese history. He pointed out that the Qing Dynasty was the most successful Dynasty in Chinese history, and the key to success was to adopt the policy of Chinese localization. Thirty years later, in 1996, Luo Youzhi (EvelynSakakidaRawski) delivered a speech at the annual meeting of the United States to challenge He Bingdis Chinese language. This paper from the Social Sciences China 130th 4 edition, author: Liu Fengyun (Liu Fengyun: Renmin University of China Institute of history of the Qing Dynasty), the original title: new Qing history of academic contend : be not of the common sort The Knights of Manchuria (source: Chinese Social Science Daily) The new history as an academic faction or research paradigm, the degree of influence in academia is incalculable, its claims in Guinea, Manchuria or other characteristics of family is no longer in the study of Qing edge problem, after the new Qing challenge again in the height of the return to the new national identity, has become a new perspective on the history of the Qing dynasty. For a period of time, the academic circles in the western world have been changing the research perspective and ideas of Chinese history. The early European Central view put China before the Opium War in the shock response mode of discourse. After 1980s, Ke Wen started from the China Central view and tried to reevaluate the development of Chinese history with the intrinsic power of Chinas own society and culture. Until the middle of 90s, the new history has become the most important trend in the United States and Western studies in the history of China in recent years, there have been a number of figures and representative works, again affected the academic Chinese. A famous debate: Manchu Chinese or Manchuria identity? Then, the new history is to move Chinese academia? It should begin with a debate. In 1967, He