设计心理学 张之欣.ppt

论文浅析 · 5. Discussion 5.3. Comparison of existing setting and Phase I – Temporary interventions 现有的环境和一期比较 - 临时干预措施 The unmown grass was the only intervention that enticed a majority of the children in the class. The children used the high grass to play hide-and-seek and to conduct secret meetings. Phase I interventions suggest that scale and spatial definition play a role in children’s interactions with the environment. However, the Phase I interventions typically engaged only a few children from the class. These temporary interventions also did not affect the children’s reliance on the equipment for play. 孩子们可以通过垒起的高高的草垛，躲在里面草进行“草丛会议” 论文浅析 · 5. Discussion Results suggest three major changes in the children’s developmental use of the yards before and after the interventions. These changes are (1) the paths of movement used by the children were altered by the stepping stone interventions in Lab A; (2) the structural nature of the social hierarchy changed in Lab C with the vegetative rooms; and (3) the children started naming the vegetative rooms in Lab C. The following discussion will focus on the significance of these observations. （1）由孩子们的移动路径改变了在实验室A中的踏脚石； （2）结构性质改变了在实验室C的社会等级和营养室 （3）孩子开始命名的营养室在实验室中 5.4. Comparison of existing setting and Phase II —— Permanent interventions 现有的设置和第二阶段的比较 设计心理学 · 论文浅析 Landscape interventions: new directions for the design of childrens outdoor play environments 景观的干预措施:儿童户外游戏环境的新方向 汇报人：张之欣 内容 · 目录 前言说明 名词解释 论文浅析 脉络 Abstract Keywords 1. Introduction 2. Materials 3. Methods 4. Results 5. Discussion 6. Conclusion  论文浅析 论文浅析 内容 · 目录 前言说明 前言 · 说明 论文浅析的对象 论文浅析的对象 选择的理由 来源 期刊论文 Landscape interventions: new directions for the design of childrens outdoor play environments 景观的干预措施: 儿童户外游戏环境的新方向 前言 · 说明 论文浅析的对象 在研究生期间一直很关于关于人的心理和场地之间的关系，在上《设计心理学》课程中，一直在读一本《交往与空间》的书，所以想通过自己看到的书结合上课所学的知识，找了这篇论文来详解。 /science/article/pii/S0169204698000875 论文浅析 · 脉络 Abstract 3. Methods 4. Results 2. Materials 5. Discussion 6. Conclusion 1. Introduction 2.1