基于icf的残疾标准内容分析与比较研究① - 中国康复研究中心.pdf

中国康复理论与实践2013 年1 月第19 卷第1 期 Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, Jan. 2013, Vol. 19, No. 1 - 22 - DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2013.01.006 ·专题· 基于ICF 的残疾标准内容分析与比较研究① 1,2 1,2 3 李沁燚 ，邱卓英 ，董向兵 [摘要] 目的 分析比较现行残疾标准。方法 基于语义与信息检索的方法，应用 《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)的分 类架构对 《劳动能力鉴定职工工伤与职业病致残等级》(GB/T 16180—2006) 、《道路交通事故受伤人员伤残评定标准》(GB 18667— 2002)和 《人身保险残疾程度与保险金给付比例表》进行编码和分类，对标准的内容进行分析比较。结果 3 种残疾标准主要分类 领域是身体结构，部分标准对身体功能进行了分类，对活动和参与有简单的分类描述，没有对环境因素进行分类。结论 ICF 分类 架构与术语可作为残疾标准的分析与开发工具，以进一步规范残疾标准的分类分级结构和内容以及术语体系，建立标准之间的联 系。 [关键词] 残疾标准；国际功能、残疾和健康分类；内容分析；语义；信息检索；术语；分类；编码 Comparison of Disability Standards Based on ICF LI Qin-yi, QIU Zhuo-ying, DONG Xiang-bing. Institute of Rehabilitation Informa- tion, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China Abstract: Objective To analyze and compare 3 Chinese standards of disability. Methods Based on the framework and terminology of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), the structure and content of 3 standards of disability, i.e., Standard for Identify Work Ability －Gradation of Disability Caused by Work-related injuries and Occupational Diseases (GB/T 16180—2006), As - sessment for Body Impairment of the Injured in Road Traffic Accidents (GB 18667—2002) and Life Insurance Disability Insurance were re - viewed. Results All the standards primarily involved body structure, partly bodily functions, little activity and participation without specific assessment, but no environmental factors. Conclusion The framework and terminology of ICF can be used in the standardization of disabili- ty standards. Key words: disability standards; International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health; context analysis; semantics; infor- mati