a 《信息与文献——图书馆绩效指标》 - evergreen education .pptVIP

a 《信息与文献——图书馆绩效指标》 - evergreen education .ppt

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
根据以上标准针对本馆的实情做了适当的修改新增的指标比如服务受益率删减的指标本馆目前无法获取统计数据的指标改变统计方法的指标某些统计计算太过复杂的指标作了简化关于图书馆服务绩效评估方面主要结论杭州图书馆的基本硬件条件已经达到或超过了我国省级公共图书馆的平均水平在个副省级城市的公共图书馆中杭州图书馆的综合水平与深圳图书馆相比有明显差距与广州市图书馆大体相当与其他城市的图书馆相比有明显优势与纽约温哥华东京大阪城市的类似公共图书馆相比杭州图书馆在馆舍条件上优势明显差距主要表现在经费保障上为纽约研究图书馆

Targeting exploring economic benefits and performance evaluation of Hangzhou Library, we designed this project upon the project “ Qiantang Distinguished Professionals ” through cooperating with Peking University and Zhejiang University. Three main aspects of study: Economic benefits evaluation of the library Performance evaluation of the library Performance Appraisal of Library Internal Work About the Evaluation of the Library’s Economic Performance Approach: The value created by libraries is numerous and most are invisible. Two approaches adopted abroad: A : Consumer surplus: the difference between the money paid by consumers for a product or service and their expectation . Since all the service provided by us is free, their expectations of the value of our service are just the value of its substitutes. B: Contingent Valuation Method (CVM: WTP ) Supposing there is a market or a way of pay and consumers are willing to pay money to get it, it is named Willingness to pay (WTP for short) About the Evaluation of the Library’s Economic Performance This paper combined those two method together, i.e. consumer surplus and WTP. In terms of the items with no market substitutes, we use WTP and consumers are enquired directly about their expected price about those items. The price of market substitutes is got through survey, while consumers’ expected price is got with questionnaires. Procedures: Identify the service items to be evaluated Identify the approaches of evaluation Apply those approaches into practice About the Evaluation of the Library’s Economic Performance Service types borrowing users Circulating borrowing journal consumer surplus disk consumer surplus

文档评论(0)

wangsux + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档