原创力文档- 1、本文档共5页，可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
原子吸收分光光度法测定铅的两种前处理方法比较研究-食品安全质量
6 8 Vol. 6 No. 8
2015 8 Journal of Food Safety and Quality Aug. , 2015
李跃彬*
(, 519040)
摘 要: 目的 2 方法 2
, , ,
Z 2 结果 87.52%, 85.45%~88.75%
; 99.03%, 96.12%~102.35%2 Z
, Z 10.14, ; Z 0.44, 结论
关键词: ; ; ;
Comparative study of 2 kinds of different pretreatments in determination of
lead by atomic absorption spectrophotometry
*
LI Yue-Bin
(By-Health Co ., Ltd ., Zhuhai 519040, China)
ABSTRACT: Objective To discuss the influence of the 2 kinds of ways of dry ashing and wet digestion to
measure lead processing. Methods Dry ashing and wet digestion were used as pretreatment with 2 kinds of
different concentrations of lead standard solution as the sample, and tested by atomic absorption
spectrophotometry; the calculation of recovery and statistical techniques in classic Z value were used to
determine the merits of the 2 kinds of ways. Results Dry ashing average recovery was 87.52%, the recovery
was between 85.45%~88.75%; Wet digestion average recovery was 99.03%, the recovery was between
96.12%~102.35%. Through the Z value calculation of recovery rate of the 2 kinds of methods, Z value was
10.14 by dry ashing, and it was not acceptable; Z value was 0.44 by wet digestion, and the result was good.
Conclusion It was proved that the result of wet digestion was better than that of dry ashing.
KEY WORDS: dry ashing
文档评论（0）