- 1、本文档共5页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
What is a valid argument? 什么是有效论证
What is a valid(符合逻辑的) argument?An argument is a set of statements aimed at explanation and/or persuasion. It consists of a conclusion/claim and premises (i.e., reasons) that support the conclusion. In formal logic, a valid argument is one in which the arguments conclusion must be true if the supporting premises are in fact true.Truth and ValidityWhether an argument is valid does not speak to the truth, or falsity, of an arguments conclusion or its premises. Validity refers simply to whether the conclusion flows logically from the premises. Thus, an argument may contain false premises and a false conclusion and still be valid.Determining ValidityTo determine whether an argument is valid, you must answer the following question: Assuming the premises are true, is another conclusion possible? If so, the argument is invalid.Soundness and ValidityA sound argument is a valid argument with true premises. Therefore, a sound argument must be a valid argument.ExamplesExamples of valid arguments are as follows:Premise: All dogs are mammals.Premise: My pet Sam is a dog.?Conclusion: Therefore, Sam must be a mammal.Premise: All banks are financial institutions.Premise: Wells Fargo is a financial institution.Conclusion: Wells Fargo is a bank.?Examples of invalid arguments follow:Premise: Only men have blue eyes.Premise: Christina has blue eyes.Conclusion: Therefore, Christina must be a man.?Premise: All Toyotas have 4-wheel drive.?Premise: My car is a 4-wheel drive car.Conclusion: Therefore, my car is a Toyota.ConsiderationsValidity is a term used to describe deductive(推论的)arguments as opposed to inductive(?归纳的)arguments. A deductive argument aims for a conclusion that must be true given true premises, whereas an inductive argument claims a highly probable conclusion, given true premises. Therefore, deductive arguments are either valid or invalid; there is no such thing as almost valid. Inductive arguments, however, fall on a spectrum(范围) from strong to weak.Source:A Concise Intro
您可能关注的文档
- Unit3 整体课件20000000000000.ppt
- Unit3__Using__Language:Reading精品课件.ppt
- unit5 book6 学案 (打印版).doc
- Unit5__Period2__参考课件.ppt
- unit7 答案.doc
- unit4终结版.ppt
- U型槽60灌溉渠施工工艺.doc
- VC++动态加入和删除菜单的方法.docx
- VI常用命令和快捷键.docx
- VOA 文章Britain Gets a Government (中英对照).doc
- 2024至2030年中国星条绸布行业投资前景及策略咨询研究报告.docx
- [湖北]2024年湖北省林业局直属事业单位招聘17人笔试历年参考题库(频考点试卷)解题思路附带答案详.docx
- 2024年中国45°鹰嘴管子钳市场调查研究报告.docx
- 2024年上轴同步带轮项目可行性研究报告.docx
- 2024年中国内孔镗刀杆市场调查研究报告.docx
- 2024年凤凰石洗手盆项目可行性研究报告.docx
- 2024年中国果醋市场调查研究报告.docx
- 2024年中国以太网络交换机市场调查研究报告.docx
- [珠海]广东珠海市干部人才储备中心选聘高层次人才笔试历年参考题库(频考点试卷)解题思路附带答案详解.docx
- [清远]2024年广东清远阳山县纪委监委招聘事业编制工作人员笔试历年参考题库(频考点试卷)解题思路附.docx
文档评论(0)