1995年高考语文应试失误及新识_3216（Chinese exam failure and new knowledge in 1995 college entrance examination _3216）.docVIP

1995年高考语文应试失误及新识_3216（Chinese exam failure and new knowledge in 1995 college entrance examination _3216） Chinese exam failure and new knowledge in 1995 college entrance examination Zhang Huijun and Nan Geng Shouxuan / Ping Entao / tree (Tianjin, Zhang Huijun and tree, Nan Geng, Ping Entao) One 1995 college entrance examination papers in basic knowledge, related to the volume 1 of the first title and the second volume fifth, a total of 14 items, total score of 42 points, unchanged from the 1994 test. From the test content, in addition to words, sentences and punctuation, literary culture, poetry appreciation, sentence dictation of these traditional items, especially enhance the appropriateness of language and written examination, even in the modern article reading questions, there are a brief summary of the questions of reading content, highlighting the candidates a concise summary and description ability of the test, which is one of the development trend of the Chinese language test in recent two years. Students answer questions in the following table. This is a sample of 50 sample measurement results. [table 1] (drawings, figures,}) (Note: the next line number score number) [table two] (drawings, figures,}) The analysis of the data shows that: 1. daily teaching and general review, often summarized and repeated training knowledge firmly, high scoring rate and higher. Like Chinese characters shape and identification, the use of commonly used words, punctuation, literary culture memory, simple poetry understanding, paragraph level division, the famous silent fill, scoring rate of 60%. This is the result of paying attention to the teaching of basic knowledge in Chinese teaching. Comparison of abnormal volume 1 is a problem 1, 4 and two b.. The first question score was 28%. This is a problem to distinguish character pronunciation, the students are familiar with this type of exercise, have done a lot of practice, why the score rate is so low? The problem is still out in