diapositive de titre, ce premier bloc est consacré au titre - circabc.ppt

Agenda Item 4: Review of the list of priority substances (Decision 2455/2001/EC) EAF(8)-04/01/INERIS Prioritisation of substances: methodology draft document for discussion Vincent Bonnomet, Valeria Dulio Priority substances for the WFD:a new context, a new proposal (p. 4) General scheme of the document: Defining the list of candidate substances(p. 7-21) Relevant candidate substances(p. 9, see also Annex VII.1 p. 76-89) Proposed lists of possible relevant candidate substances (p. 11-19) Existing substances (Reg. EEC 793/93) Pesticides (Dir. 91/414/EEC) Biocides (Dir. 98/8/EC) POPs (Reg. 850/2004/EC) New substances (Dir. 93/67/EEC) HPVC PBT substances OSPAR lists Cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, veterinary products Endocrine disrupters Substances monitored by Member States Towards a manageable working list(p.19) Dedicated and harmonised databases are currently lacking for the EU. Improvements are expected after REACH-IT, WISE, E-PRTR,… Limited resources and time constraints to collect data for all those substances. Also, confidentiality of data (production volumes, new substances) Parameters for prioritisation(p. 22-30) Data collation(p. 31-55) Data processing Choosing relevant metadata Retrieve or request relevant information in order to: - evaluate the quality of the collected data - propose a sound data aggregation Quality check / plausibility check Treatment of missing data and data gaps(p. 54) Data aggregation Prioritisation algorithms(p. 56-70) Risk ratio(p. 57) Risk indices (COMMPS approach)(p. 57-63)  Example(p. 66) Specific strategy for inorganic compounds(p. 71-74) EAF-PS (8), Brussels, 20/02/2006 slide * International Office for Water EAF-PS (8), Brussels, 20/02/2006 slide * EAF (8) Meeting, CCAB, Brussels, 20/02/2006 Art. 16(4) of the WFD: “The Commission shall review the adopted list of priority substances […] and come forward with proposals as appropriate.” Sinc