从赵作海案和辛普森案谈中西法律理念的差别（Chinese and western legal philosophy from Zhao Zuohai case and Simpson case difference）.docVIP

从赵作海案和辛普森案谈中西法律理念的差别（Chinese and western legal philosophy from Zhao Zuohai case and Simpson case difference） Chinese and western legal philosophy from Zhao Zuohai case and Simpson case difference.Txt41 water can penetrate stone, only because it never hit the same point. 42 matches if the escape the burning pain, its life will be intense darkness without light. Zhao Zuohai doubts are obviously unjust case, the public security caused by dereliction of duty. Henan provincial high court president Zhang Liyong said: this case has many doubts, but there has been such a decision, the three public security authorities are responsible, is not adhere to the facts, the law as the criterion of the principle, did not adhere to the principle of never suspected crime. Jiang Benwei lawyers believe that if we can not adhere to the suspect from sin principle, similar to the Zhao Zhenhai case will continue to occur in our country. No doubt, no crime is a basic principle recognized in the international criminal justice field, and it is one of the specific contents of the principle of presumption of innocence. That is, the defendant is not guilty in the absence of proof of the guilt of the accused and the absence of proof of the defendants innocence. To a great extent, it protects the interests of the accused and protects the rights of the citizens. In the judicial practice of our country, for a long time, we failed to regard this principle as the basic principle of criminal law trial, but on the contrary, we adhered to the principle of suspected crime is always there. Now, it seems, to a large extent, hinders the judicial process in China and undermines the personal rights of citizens. Because you never know who will be the next Zhao Zhenhai or she xianglin. Coupled with the long-term existence in Chinas judicial practice of procedural justice, ignoring the inquisition by torture, and our lack of oversight mechanisms, these are unjust case foreshadowed. Since the reform and opening up,