不方便法院论文：不方便法院原则在我国的适用研究.docVIP

不方便法院论文：不方便法院原则在我国的适用研究 【中文摘要】不方便法院原则(Doctrine of Forum Non Convenience)作为平衡宽泛管辖权的工具广泛应用于英美法系国家,其有效地解决了法院的案件积压问题,平衡了当事人的权益,但其过于灵活的适用方式也为部分大陆法系国家所不能接受。但随着经济全球化,其作为缓和国际民商事管辖权冲突的一种有效手段,正被越来越多的国家与地区所接受。虽然我国对于是否引入该原则一直存在着分歧,我国各地方法院和最高人民法院适用该原则的判例已然为我国引入不方便法院原则提供了实践基础。本文将通过介绍不方便法院原则产生、发展的过程,以揭示其存在的意义与价值,并对几种主要的不方便法院原则模式进行分析、比较,为我国不方便法院原则制度的构建提供几点浅陋见解。本文正文部分分为四章。第一章对不方便法院原则的概念以及其在各国产生、发展的历史过程进行介绍。通过对该原则在两大法系存在形式的阐述,指出各模式中可供借鉴之处。第二章对不方便法院原则的最新发展进行了探讨。在制定有关国际民商事管辖权公约时各国对于不方便法院原则的争论,以及美国最近对不方便法院原则适用作出的改变都对不方便法院原则被国家接受产生了较大影响。第三章主要对我国适用不方便法院原则的利弊进行了分析,并对我国已颁布的相关政策以及已判决的案例进行了总结。第四章将在对各国不方便法院原则制度比较分析的基础上,对我国不方便法院原则制度的设计提出建议。 【英文摘要】The Doctrine of Forum Non Convenience (DFNC) plays a positive role in restraining the expanding jurisdiction, alleviating the worrisome burden of the courts, and balancing the interests of the litigants. The DFNC is a doctrine of Common Law, but it抯 been followed by many countries, including the countries of Civil Law System. There are different opinions about this doctrine in China. This Note will explore the connotation and the value of this doctrine by studying the development and the current application of the DFNC. After a comparing of the mentioned system about DFNC in other countries, at the end of this Note, I would give some humble opinions on setting a DFNC system in China.The main body of this Note can be divided into four chapters.Chapter One of this Note begins by giving a definition to the DFNC, then will explain the development of the DFNC in other countries, which could afford us lessons that merit attention.Chapter Two discusses the current application of the DFNC in the United States, and the controversy between the Common Law System and the Civil Law System about the DFNC when drafting the treaty on jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters.Chapter Three acknowledges the pros and cons of applying the DFNC in China, and gives a conclusion to the prejudication made by Chinese courts.Chapter Four puts forward the advices of how to e