512周年盘点 那些被误解的跨国公司（The 512th anniversary of the misapprehend of multinational companies）.docVIP

512周年盘点 那些被误解的跨国公司（The 512th anniversary of the misapprehend of multinational companies） Editors note: After the earthquake, many enterprises have been pushed to the point of public opinion. Since May 12, 2008, the number of donations has been an indicator of compassion, and almost every multinational company has been weighed down. At this moment, have appeared on the Internet a miser international rankings, and quickly spread, samsung, nokia, Louis vuitton, multinational companies such as McDonalds, KFC is one of its top, by netizens torture conscience, that formed in the wide range of some of them are thought to donate too few enterprises. Is that really the case? Can the list of contributions become moral rulers? Some netizens expressed their views. Some rich people are reluctant to be rich because of a variety of concerns, and may help the disaster area through anonymous donations. What would the donor companies think? There are articles that write: if you have money or no money, you just give your own opinion that you think appropriate. People dont have to talk about it, as if they are forcing some people to donate to a certain number. After all, donations are voluntary, a social good, not a liquidation. Charity is not money, it is heart. It is understood that after the earthquake, there is some multinationals reaction faster than domestic companies, this is because the multinational parent company is in a foreign country, are also joint stock system, although most of these companies set aside money for charity, but still must be approved by the board of directors, and the amount of the severity of the size of the affirmation and disasters, so often before did not understand the situation will only be carried out in accordance with the regular donations, once learned that the disasters caused by the actual damage will continuously increase. Have media quoted insiders as saying that does not love does not suggest that these enterprises, on the contrary, because