高空抛物的立法反思.docxVIP

XXXXXXXX学院本科毕业论文（设计）题目高空抛物的立法反思指导教师 XX职称________学生姓名XX学号XXXXXXXXXX专业XX班级XXXXXXXX系 别XXXXXX完成时间 20XX年X月XX日高空抛物的立法反思摘要近年来社会经济飞快的发展，各地纷纷掀起了城市化建设的热潮，高层建筑也随之增多，现实生活中几乎每天都在发生高空抛物致人损害案件，这种情况不仅给受害人造成了严重的伤害，还给社会带来了很大的负面影响。在《侵权责任法》实施以前，高空抛物致人损害案件的司法审判处在两难的境地：若判决由建筑物使用人分担责任或者由物业公司承担部分责任，明显缺乏相关法律依据；若裁定驳回原告起诉，又将使法院面临巨大的社会压力。如典型的“重庆烟灰缸案”、 “深圳南山好来居高空抛物案”。因为当时我国对此类案件并无相关立法规定，各地法院对相似案件适用的依据也各不相同，导致判决结果也不一致，这在当时的理论界和司法界都引起了强烈的争议。《侵权责任法》第87条填补了我国现行法律中关于高空抛物致人损害案件的法律空白，但这并不表明我国对高空抛物致人损害制度的探讨或研究就此而止。因为己有的法律规定还存在着很多问题，制度的设计还存在一定的缺陷。本文通过从高空抛物致害的概述、实务研究、立法规定及评析、立法构想四个方面提出我国高空抛物致人损害制度的进步和不足，对我国高空抛物致人损害制度的立法完善提出合理性建议。关键词高空抛物、侵权责任法、公平责任、救济、补偿REFLECTIONSONLEGISLATIONOFHIGH-ALTITUDEPARABOLICABSTRACTThe rapid development of social economy, the city set off the boom, high-rise residential gradually increased, resulting in high-rise buildings falling objects of unknown virulence cases in real life almost happen every day, not only to victims, causing serious losses, brings negative influence to society.Before the implementation of the tort liability law, high-altitude parabolic cause damage cases on the judicial judgment: the dilemma facing the decision by the city building use one to share the blame, or by Property Management Company to take part of the responsibility of the lack of a clear legal basis, but the court rejected the plaintiff sued and will enable the court faces enormous social pressure. As a typical Chongqing ashtray case, Shenzhen Nanshan good high-altitude parabolic case. Because at that time China has no legislation on the provisions of such cases, the court throughout the different applicable basis of similar cases, lead to the verdict is not one which in the theoretical circles and judicial circles at that time have caused intense controversy.Tort liability act eighty-seventh China to fill the blank of law on high-rise buildings caused by unidentified throwing objects virulence cases of students in law, but this does not indicate that we of the high-rise building damage caus