- 1、本文档共11页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
两种防治腰硬联合麻醉后神经根损伤方法疗效比较
两种防治腰硬联合麻醉后神经根损伤方法疗效比较[摘要] 目的 探讨防治下腹部与下肢手术腰硬联合麻醉后神经根损伤的最佳方法。 方法 87例腰硬联合麻醉过程中出现神经根刺激症状即为神经根损伤的手术患者,随机分为两组:Ⅰ组手术结束后甲钴胺序贯疗法:注射用甲钴胺0.5mg加入生理盐水250mL静滴,每日1次,7d后改为口服甲钴胺片0.5mg,每日3次,共15d;Ⅱ组手术结束前,硬膜外腔注入地塞米松5mg+维生素B12 0.5mg+生理盐水3mL复合液防治。观察麻醉消退后皮肤感觉障碍的情况和发生时间;评价药物疗效;观察出院时患者对神经根损伤后遗症的担忧情况。结果 Ⅰ、Ⅱ组防治有效率分别为71.4%与93.3%,神经根并发症发生率分别为28.6%与6.7%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Ⅱ组担忧人数少于Ⅰ组(P<0.05)。 结论 硬膜外及时应用地塞米松与维生素B12复合液能减少术后神经根损伤并发症的发生率。
[关键词] 地塞米松;维生素B12;甲钴胺;腰硬联合麻醉;神经根损伤
[中图分类号] R614.27 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2011)35-80-02
Curative Effect Comprison between Two Ways to Prevent and Cure Nerve Root Injury Caused by the Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia
ZHU Hongbo1 REN Qiusheng2 ZHENG Shanshan1
1.Department of Anesthesiology, Ningbo City Yinzhou District Wujianming Hospital, Ningbo 315153, China; 2. Department of Anesthesiology, Ningbo City Yinzhou People’s Hospital, Ningbo 315040, China
[Abstract] Objective To find out the better way to prevent and cure nerve root injury caused by the combined spinal-epidural anesthesia(CSEA). Methods Eighty-seven patients suffered from the nerve root injury, which means one had a nerve root irritation symptom during CSEA, were divided into two groups randomly. Group I was treated by mecobalamin sequential therapy after surgery: 250mL normal saline added with 0.5mg injectable mecobalamin was infused through vein once daily. 7 days later, it was replaced by the oral medication of 0.5mg mecobalamin tablets three times daily. Group II: The compound including 5mg dexamethasone, 0.5mg vitamin B12 and 3mL normal saline was injected into the epidural space before the surgery completed. To observe the time and situation of skin feeling deficiency after the anesthesia vanished;evaluate the efficacy of the two treatment methods, and the patients’ concerns about consequences of the nerve root injury. Results The effective percent were 71.4% versus 93.3%(Group Ⅰ vs Group II), while the incidence rate of complication was 28.6% versus 6.7%(Group I vs Group II)
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 水电水利工程基本词汇对照表(法语).docx
- 车间班长个人年终总结范本5篇.docx
- 基于MATLAB的HDB3码编译器的优化设计与实现.pdf VIP
- 一汽奥迪AudiQ7汽车使用手册用户说明书pdf电子版下载.pdf
- 一汽奥迪Q7_车型手册电子版下载_非汽车用户车主车辆使用操作驾驶说明书.pdf VIP
- DL-T-5564-2019输变电工程接入系统设计规程.docx VIP
- 小学奥数题库《几何》-直线型-燕尾模型-2星题(含解析)全国通用版.docx
- 老年综合评估及干预技术应用规范.docx VIP
- 城市老旧小区适老化改造的路径探讨(工程毕业论文资料).doc
- 2023年中国城市居民养老政策体系与市场规模评估报告.pdf VIP
文档评论(0)