- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
急性脑梗死患者介入治疗后围术期护理措施
急性脑梗死患者介入治疗后围术期护理措施[摘要] 目的 探讨急性脑梗死患者在介入治疗围术期的护理措施,观察其临床疗效、评价其应用价值。 方法 对2009年10月~2011年6月在我院进行治疗的76例急性脑梗死患者均进行介入治疗,在围术期对患者采取不同的护理措施,将患者随机分为观察组(n = 38)和对照组(n = 38),对照组患者采用常规护理方法,观察组患者采用综合护理措施,对两组患者的恢复效果、住院时间及患者的满意度等进行比较。 结果 恢复情况:观察组和对照组的总有效率分别为94.74%和76.32%,观察组患者治疗有效率高于对照组患者,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05);患者满意度:观察组患者满意度为92.11%,对照组患者满意度为73.68%,观察组患者的满意度好于对照组患者,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05);住院时间:观察组患者平均住院时间为(14.95±2.43)d,对照组患者的平均住院时间为(20.04±2.36)d,观察组患者住院时间短于对照组患者,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。 结论 综合护理措施能够提高急性脑梗死患者介入治疗后围术期的有效率及满意度,同时缩短了患者的住院时间,其临床效果较好,具有很好的应用价值。
[关键词] 急性脑梗死;介入治疗;综合护理;临床疗效
[中图分类号] R473.7 [文献标识码] C [文章编号] 1673-7210(2012)08(b)-0129-03
Nursing intervention in the interventional treatment of patients with acute cerebral infarction
LI Yuxing
Department of Neurosurgery, the Center Hospital of Nanyang City, He’nan Province, Nanyang 473000, China
[Abstract] Objective To investigate nursing intervention in the interventional treatment of patients with acute cerebral infarction, and observe the clinical curative effect and evaluate its application value. Methods There were 76 patients treated by the interventional treatment in our hospital from October 2009 to June 2011 who were given different nursing interventions in the preoperative period. All patients were divided into control group and observation group with 38 cease in each group. The control group was treated by conventional care method; the observation group was treated by comprehensive nursing measures, the restoring effect, and length of time the patients and the satisfaction of the two groups were observed. Results The restoring effect: the total effective rate of the observation group and control group were 94.74% and 76.32%, the observation group patients therapy was higher than those in the control group (P 0.05); the satisfaction of patients: the satisfaction of the observation group and the control group were 92.11% and 73.68% (P 0.05); the length of time of the observation group and the control group were (14.95±2.43) a
文档评论(0)