经颅多普勒超声对颈动脉病变侧支血流评价.docVIP

经颅多普勒超声对颈动脉病变侧支血流评价.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
经颅多普勒超声对颈动脉病变侧支血流评价

经颅多普勒超声对颈动脉病变侧支血流评价[摘要] 目的 经颅多普勒超声(transcranial Doppler,TCD)的血流动力学参数评价侧支代偿能力的敏感性和特异性。 方法 经数字减影血管造影(digital subtraction angiography,DSA)证实的单侧颈动脉完全闭塞患者41例,依据DSA侧支分级分为完全代偿组和不完全代偿组,计算患侧大脑中动脉(MCA)与健侧MCA峰值流速的比值(dVMCA/nVMCA),及患侧MCA与健侧MCA搏动指数的比值(dPIMCA/nPIMCA),比较代偿是否完全时,峰值流速比值和搏动指数比值的不同,通过ROC曲线分析,确定TCD评估标准。并分析TCD血流指标与侧支类别、数量的关系。 结果 TCD与DSA比较,评价大脑中动脉供血区域代偿较完全,dVMCA/nVMCA0.65时,敏感性为76%,特异性为75%,dPIMCA/nPIMCA0.60时,敏感性为90%,特异性为60%。dVMCA/nVMCA、dPIMCA/nPIMCA与侧支开放的数目无关。 结论 TCD能够通过血液动力学参数评价侧支血流代偿的程度,能够反映半球的灌注情况,评价侧支血流的多少比评价开放侧支的数量更有意义。 [关键词] 颈动脉狭窄;侧支循环;数字减影血管造影;经颅多普勒超声 [中图分类号] R543.4 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2012)07(b)-0081-03 Transcranial Doppler evaluation on collateral flow in patients with carotid artery occlusion LI Yao HE Jintao CHENG Bing WU Jixing HOU Jingjing TANG Hua BAI Wei LIU Yang ZHANG Juan Department of Neurology, the 6th Hospital of Beijing, Beijing 100007, China [Abstract] Objective To determine the accuracy of transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound, a noninvasive and cost-effective method, for evaluation on collateral flow in patients with carotid artery occlusion. Methods 41 patients with unilateral carotid artery occlusion were included and divided into two groups depend on the collateral degrees defined by DSA. Calculated the ratio of systolic flow velocity and pulsatility index of MCA in affected side with unaffected side (dVMCA/nVMCA and dPIMCA/nPIMCA) and compared the ratios between the groups. The ROC analysis was used to define transcranial Doppler criteria for distinct collateral degree. The ratios were also compared between the groups of different type and number of collaterals and between the carotid occlusion and control group. Results Compared with DSA, the sensitivity was 76% and specificity was 75% for dVMCA / nVMCA0.65. The sensitivity was 90% and specificity was 60% for dPIMCA/ nPIMCA 0.60 to predict complete collateral flow in MCA region. The ratios of dVMCA /nVMCA and dPIMCA /nPIMCA did not associated with the number of cpllaterals. C

文档评论(0)

docman126 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:7042123103000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档