- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
莫西沙星治疗老年下呼吸道感染临床疗效及安全性探究
莫西沙星治疗老年下呼吸道感染临床疗效及安全性探究[摘要] 目的 探讨莫西沙星治疗老年下呼吸道感染的临床疗效及安全性。 方法 将86例老年下呼吸道感染患者随机分为观察组和对照组,各43例,观察组给予莫西沙星注射液400 mg/d静脉滴注治疗,对照组给予左氧氟沙星注射液400 mg/d静脉滴注治疗。观察两组患者临床疗效、细菌清除率、症状消退时间及不良反应情况,并进行对比分析。 结果 观察组总有效率为95.35%,明显高于对照组的79.07%(P < 0.05);观察组细菌总清除率为93.55%,明显高于对照组的68.75%(P < 0.05);观察组发热、咳嗽、咳痰及肺部啰音等症状消退时间明显低于对照组(P < 0.05);两组不良反应均较轻微,且发生率比较无显著差异(P > 0.05)。 结论 莫西沙星治疗老年下呼吸道感染具有疗效好、见效快、抗菌广谱、药效持久等诸多优点,且不良反应轻微,可作为目前临床治疗老年下呼吸道感染的一种首选药物。
[关键词] 老年下呼吸道感染;莫西沙星;左氧氟沙星;细菌清除率
[中图分类号] R56 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2012)07(b)-0062-03
Clinical efficacy and safety study of Moxifloxacin in the treatment of elderly patients with lower respiratory tract infection
ZHENG Yongyi
Department of Internal Medicine, Sanxiang Hospital of Zhongshan City, Guangdong Province, Zhongshan 528463, China
[Abstract] Objective To study the clinical efficacy and safety of Moxifloxacin in the treatment of elderly patients with lower respiratory tract infection. Methods 86 cases of elderly patients with lower respiratory tract infection were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group, with 43 cases in each group, the observation group was given Moxifloxacin Injection 400 mg/d intravenous infusion therapy, the control group was given Levofloxacin Injection 400 mg/d intravenous infusion therapy. The clinical efficacy of the two groups, the rate of bacterial clearance, symptoms subsided time and adverse reactions were observed, and the contrast analysis was carried on. Results In the observation group, the total effective rate was 95.35%, significantly higher than 79.07% of control group (P < 0.05); the observation group total bacterial clearance rate was 93.55%, significantly higher than 68.75% of control group (P < 0.05); fever, cough, expectoration of observation group and pulmonary rales and other symptoms subsided time were significantly lower than those of control group (P < 0.05); two groups of adverse reactions were mild, and the occurrence rate was no significant different (P >
文档评论(0)