公共使用与公共利益的法律解读(Legal interpretation of public use and public interest).docVIP

公共使用与公共利益的法律解读(Legal interpretation of public use and public interest).doc

  1. 1、本文档共28页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
公共使用与公共利益的法律解读(Legal interpretation of public use and public interest)

公共使用与公共利益的法律解读(Legal interpretation of public use and public interest) Legal interpretation of public use and public interest Keywords: public use/public interest/expropriation right/restriction A brief introduction to the new London collection New London is a small city in Connecticut. In previous years, the citys economy has been depressed and lost The rate of industry has soared and the population has been lost. To promote economic recovery, in January 1998, the state government approved the issue The bank has funded a private non-profit entity, the new London development corporation (NLDC), to develop urban planning Activities. In February of that year, Pfizer plans to invest in a research facility in new London. Local officials Think of the research institute and the proposed coast guard museum as the center of the river Thames Commercial development. In January 2000, the municipal government approved a comprehensive opening of 90 acres of land developed by the NLDC Plan and entrust NLDC as the development agent to implement. At the same time, authorize NLDC to purchase or collect Private property. The NLDC has successfully negotiated a majority of the 90 acres of real estate, but it is Others, who refused to sell, were frustrated. In November of that year, the NLDC initiated the collection procedure That led to the case. December, susette? Nine owners, including kylo, have appealed to new London and NLDC The high court of the land, which advocated the imposition of a public use of the fifth amendment of the constitution Use). The two sides appealed to Connecticut after the high court ruled against some property expropriation The state Supreme Court, and the state Supreme Court, determined the validity of all the charges. And then, kylo and so on The federal Supreme Court has appealed to the government to impose its property on private economic development as unconstitutional Behavior. On February 22, 2005, the Supreme Court heard the case. In the courtroom deb

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

f8r9t5c + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:8000054077000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档