赛扬d与sempron（赛扬d与sempron）.doc

赛扬d与sempron（赛扬d与sempron） It is likely that the AMD product line will be clear, rather than the lip of the Athlon era. In fact, clear and overlapping segments of the product are good for profits. With this, Intel has greater initiative and clearer thinking. Its products are listed according to frequency, and there is no big conflict. And AMDs multiple core overlaps have caused a lot of unnecessary trouble. In the eyes of the general population, the CPU is not a small upgrade. Now lets see if its true. Recently, the big media on the Sempron and Celeron two of the comparison test is rich and informative, the author here secretly lazy, brief analysis of their data. In this way, there are also benefits of being blinded by individual phenomena. The author first describes the Sempron naming idea, and it still uses the PR algorithm. I think it is a kind of directive naming, which is to guide the customers to compare the Intel processor. It still will be estimated as the standard frequency Celeron processor. I also think this is a good strategy, because the new core Celeron frequency has a great increase in space, so AMD is obviously the PR value high jump. This is the reason many people find the equivalent performance of Athlon2400+ Sempron2800+, AMD is on leave for their own future competition due to a posterior, power supply and heating and other reasons, believe that CY to 3.5G or so rare to climb. Two, the donkey or horse, Taiwan outcome evaluation First, lets take a look at the contrast test data for mainstream CPU, which does some simple testing of CPU performance. (test chart 1) Because compression tests are more frequency dependent, Intel seems to be more expensive in this respect. So its two Pentium tops the list. Especially the Proscott core 3.4E, worthy of our attention, can show the Prosott wave is not undeserved reputation, which can enhance the performance of about 5% in the same frequency. Then we must pay attention to the Sempron 3100+, the leading Celeron D