姜伯驹新课标让数学课失去了什么（Jiang Boju the new curriculum standard of mathematics class let what was lost）.docVIP

下载本文档

7
0
约9.3千字
约 7页
2017-08-16 发布于河南
举报
版权申诉

姜伯驹新课标让数学课失去了什么（Jiang Boju the new curriculum standard of mathematics class let what was lost）.doc

1、本文档共7页，可阅读全部内容。
2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
5、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
6、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
7、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

姜伯驹新课标让数学课失去了什么（Jiang Boju the new curriculum standard of mathematics class let what was lost）

姜伯驹新课标让数学课失去了什么（Jiang Boju the new curriculum standard of mathematics class let what was lost） ginger | The new curriculum to math class what is lost Author: Cai Chuang source: Guangming Daily hits: 934 update time: 2006-5-7 Education weekly: in the just concluded NPC and CPPCC, you submit a proposal, it is pointed out that In the full-time compulsory education mathematics curriculum standard implementation (trial version), which we often say the new mathematics curriculum standard, there is a more serious problem. In your opinion, what is the biggest problem? Jiang Boju: the new curriculum standard promulgated in July 2001, according to the new standard of writing new textbooks were published and tried out. The original step by step, rolling development, full implementation until 2010. In fact, in September 2004, has been in the country except the hasty implementation, individual counties. In my opinion, the new curriculum standard reform direction has significant deviation, entirely new curriculum system in practice teaching, has caused the confusion. In particular, the new curriculum standard compared with several mathematics teaching syllabus after many years of implementation, the total level is lower. This is the wrong way. Education weekly: lower level, perhaps in order to let students learn less, especially some of the difficult knowledge of junior high school students, to relieve their heavy academic burden. From this point of view, the new curriculum standard seems to have no reason. Jiang Boju: never mind with this burden. We have to ask: is now the student burden, or students in the past heavy burden? I am afraid that most people will say, now the students burden. From the math class, the students knowledge is not more than in the past. Also, not much burden on the weight. On the contrary, the teacher speak less, do more Diao, heavier burden on students. Now the students are trapped in the sea tactical, examination not test the ability of students, but t