对中日企业海外并购差异的比较与探讨（Comparison and Discussion on overseas acquisitions in Japan between enterprises）.docVIP

对中日企业海外并购差异的比较与探讨（Comparison and Discussion on overseas acquisitions in Japan between enterprises） Comparison and Discussion on overseas acquisitions in Japan between enterprises 2010-7-26 At present, Chinas large enterprises have a strong willingness to overseas mergers and acquisitions, and actively promote the internationalization of enterprises. With the end of the 1980s Japanese companies are very similar. Facing the road and daily choose merger between enterprises of the two countries with similar economic environment at home and abroad are closely related: the strong enhancement of foreign currency purchasing power enterprises; economic crisis happened in Europe and the United States, and the countrys economic development remains relatively strong growth momentum; intensifying economic and trade frictions with the United States and European countries, trade protectionism; trade surplus great, the State encourages and supports enterprises overseas mergers and acquisitions; financial asset prices have created opportunities for mergers and acquisitions. However, similar overseas mergers and acquisitions background did not produce the same results: overseas mergers and acquisitions of Japanese companies to buy high, sell low. While the Chinese enterprises in overseas mergers and acquisitions are money is spent, fruitless. This is a problem worthy of our consideration, we explore the reasons for the formation of overseas mergers and acquisitions differences in theory. A national economic system, political differences lead to different treatment of mergers and acquisitions Political risk is an important factor affecting the overseas mergers and acquisitions. Between countries with similar or identical political system, often less political interference by mergers and acquisitions. Even if the merger involves the petroleum, mining and other natural resources, mergers and acquisitions are rarely the intensification of political risk. Therefore, Japan as a capitalist