法学教学方法的反思与企业培训改善（Reflection on teaching methods of law and improvement of enterprise training）.docVIP

法学教学方法的反思与企业培训改善（Reflection on teaching methods of law and improvement of enterprise training） For a long time, there has been Chinese law education occupation education and general education, elite education and mass education, quality education and professional education, special education and liberal education, exam oriented education and further education, school education and practice education and other aspects of the dispute. And the legal education often needs to carry out and carry out with the aid of the law teaching activity. According to the understanding of higher education, the teaching method in the teaching activities of teachers how to exert influence on the students, how to make scientific and cultural knowledge to students and cultivate students ability, analysis of the specific means of intellectual development, formed a certain moral quality and accomplishment. The current law teaching method is the mainstream of traditional teaching method, and with the transformation of legal education, we deal with the law teaching method especially due attention and the necessary reflection of classroom teaching method. I. reflection on the teaching methods of law The traditional law class teaching method is what the teacher says, what the students listen to, and whether they accept the book knowledge in class as the main standard to measure the student s learning level. This method of teaching law can be passed down for many years, and has its own unique features. The advantages of this kind of teaching methods include: first, pay attention to the systematicness of legal knowledge, and teachers are grasped by the framework of legal knowledge in one aspect, and they are taught to students through classroom instruction. In this frame system, there are both legal concept, provision and legal principle. There are both levels and emphases. Secondly, pay attention to the spread of legal spirit. Thirdly, teachers have academic monopoly. Fourth, the material condit