收银员案例及其分析（Case analysis and cashier）.docVIP

收银员案例及其分析（Case analysis and cashier） Cashier case and analysis Case 1: In March 18, 2003, a high school student, one to a mall to buy learning machine. A little money money mall cashier, that there are two tickets for $100 yuan counterfeit money, then confiscated Chen Mou allowing no explanation, 200 yuan suspicious coins, and issued in the name of the mall a confiscation receipt. Its content is: Chen a confiscation of counterfeit 200 yuan, a shopping mall. In March 19, 2003, Mouzhi father took the documents to find the store that confiscated 200 yuan of money, but was rejected. In March 25th, Chen Chen is a Mouzhi father to the plaintiff, as their legal representatives to court, asked the store return 200 yuan. In court mediation fails, the court to order the defendant to compensate the plaintiff Chen is the mall a 200 yuan, and bear the cost of litigation case. Case study: The cashiers execution of confiscation is an invalid act beyond the administrative authority. The provisions of the law of the peoples Bank of Peoples Republic of China: confirmation of the authenticity of the RMB bank, the confiscation of counterfeit bank ownership, the public security department, any other unit or individual shall have the right to confiscate, but the commercial service department has found the collection of counterfeit bank assistance obligations. In other words, the general masses or cashier in cash receipts when the discovery of counterfeit money (indeed suspicious coins), should be the first collection of counterfeit money, and then sent to the bank in time to identify. At the same time the cashier seized counterfeit currency, to consumers must issue a certificate, the certificate should be stated in the notes of the suspicious face value, number, ready to be turned over to the name of bank notes, so that consumers to go to the bank after the receipt of the query. Due to the bank for the collection of counterfeit money have to register, if after inspection is counterfeit m