比较优势理论和产业发展战略（Theory of comparative advantage and industrial development strategy）.docVIP

比较优势理论和产业发展战略（Theory of comparative advantage and industrial development strategy） The comparative advantage of static and dynamic comparative advantage On the relationship between opening and industry development in our country, the present theory exists two different opinion. The author sums up as follows: The first opinion, should give full play to the comparative advantage of Chinas labor-intensive industries, into the international division of labor system, to solve the employment problem; as far as possible the use of foreign capital, learning foreign advanced technology and management technology; national industry is a secondary issue, as long as the Chinese land production, tax, can increase employment; industrial structure the optimization problem should be mainly determined by the market, advocating industrial policy is to follow the planned economy idea. Second views: emphasize to keep national economy independence under the condition of opening up; moderation opening, attracting foreign investment to moderate, pay attention to economic security (industry); countries need to implement active industrial policy; it is necessary in the field to catch up with the strategic industry. The above two different tendencies, a series of problems exist in international environment, national development strategy and economic system reform in the role of government and market and so on the judgment of the differences. The authors basic view is: we must adhere to the reform and opening direction, because today is a lot of problems of state-owned enterprises and the industrial structure, the root cause lies in the old system reform is not complete and the new order of the market economy is not perfect. But the question of whether in international competition before independence, to adhere to the industry to protect themselves and support national strategic industry, the author does not agree with the first opinion. Many articles tend to use globalization, instead of free